Step up Dr Pepper, Axl rose to the test

Free Dr Pepper for everyone in America.

It’s time to put Dr Pepper to the test. Hand em’ over, guys. Axl Rose has proven you wrong. Your cheap publicity has come back to bite you in the ass.

Last March, Dr Pepper made a hefty wager with Guns N’ Roses, suggesting that their much anticipated and long awaited album, “Chinese Democracy” wouldn’t be released by the end of 2008. The price of the wager? Dr. Pepper vowed to give “everyone in America” a free can of Dr Pepper.

Guess what; “Chinese Democracy” is set to be released on Nov. 23 of this year, well within the limits of the wager.

Dr Pepper made this wager as “Chinese Democracy” was initially set to be released in March of 2007 and then was suddenly no longer set for release and no further release date was set.

According to Reuters, in an article published last March, at the time of the wager, Rose had allegedly spent $13 million in recording costs for “Chinese Democracy,” the bands newest album since 1991.

According to an article published in the National Post this week, Dr Pepper will fulfill its end of the wager, provided “Chinese Democracy does,” in fact, come out in November.

To get your free can of pop, you will have to do is go to the Dr Pepper website, get your coupon and cash ‘er in.

To put Dr Pepper’s promise into perspective, one can for everyone in America is more than 30 547 597 300 calories and 822 851 271 grams of sugar.


Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Dion and the Liberals bringin’ down the house and how Layton and the NDP have been caught in the middle

Harper, Dion and Layton

Harper, Dion and Layton

It happened just like we all knew it would. The election is over, nobody came out to vote, the conservatives won another minority and it looks like another couple years of shit in Canada.

Leading up to, throughout and after the election, there has remained one person that nobody is happy with, and he led the Liberal Party until he stepped down last Monday: Stephane Dion.

In a desperate search to fill the spot, the Liberal party went in search of a new leader two years ago. The main contenders that the Liberal Party were to choose from were:

-Michael Ignateiff

-Bob Rae

-Gerard Kennedy

-Stephane Dion

Bob Rae has a tainted past in Ontario, Gerard Kennedy is little-known outside Toronto and Ontario, Ignateiff dug himself into a few holes with comments on the Isreal-Palestine conflict and his complete support of Canada’s mission in Afghanistan, and then there was Dion. He had been around for a while; he never really upset anyone, could appeal to French-Canada, and had a passion for something becoming very trendy and very relevant in North America: the environment. After all, he was a former Environment Minister under Paul Martin.

Dion had been criticized since he became leader, and sure, he fucked up. The criticism just needs to be redirected. There was nobody experienced and popular enough to fill the position to the extent that past leaders have.

Dion was the best candidate for the job. The Liberals, in 2006, were stuck to decide who would be less-worse than the others in the running. Whether or not this was their own fault, is a completely separate matter. Dion just happened to be the least bad of all the contenders.

The problems worth criticizing are much bigger than Dion being a weak party leader. The Liberals, showing difficulty in finding a suitable leader (for the second time now), appear weak as a party. As the official opposition to the Conservatives, the unstable Liberals pose a threat to political compromises between the left and right.

With the Green Party’s new found support threatening the division of the left vote in the polls leading up to the election (though not a single MP won in their riding), the floundering Liberal Party and Harper’s stronger and larger Conservative minority, the collective leftist voice is becoming harder to hear in Canada.

I need to be clear. I’m not writing this because I am offended by criticisms of Dion or, for that matter, as a supporter of the Liberal Party.  I am a leftist and an NDP.

Whoever it is, the Liberal Party ought to elect their new leader soon  before their situation becomes worse and communication between the left and right disintegrate completely.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Are there any videos left on YouTube?

There are many videos on YouTube no longer available to watch.

Tonight alone, I have run into 7 dead video links on the site.

I noticed yesterday that they were undergoing site maintenance, which may have had something to do with this.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

If strategic voting offends you, don’t read this

Recent polls have shown the NDP to be gaining support across the country. They aren’t gaining their support however, through lost Conservative support. Most, if not all of the NDP’s boost in support is coming from what was previously Liberal.

This seems like an obvious conclusion to make; The Liberal party, for the most part, is losing support, the Conservatives are staying fairly stable- if not increasing-, and the NDP is gaining national support, putting them nearly head-to-head with the Liberals.

The Green party, in the lead up to our October 14 election, is gaining support rapidly. Very rapidly.

Now, to continue with the pre-election polls: it looks, to be quite honest, that the Conservatives are going to win again. Whether or not they will win a minority, as they did last time, or a majority, is still up for argument. The major contest, by the looks of it, is going to be the opposition, and will realistically be a contest between the Liberals and the NDP, despite the Green Party’s growing support.

Now, let’s be honest; A Harper majority, to the Greens, must be a scary idea. For that matter, as a supporter of the Green, even the Liberals are far from ideal- despite the fact that Stephane Dion named his dog Kyoto. The NDP though, to the Greens, has got to be better.

As of yesterday, the Canadian Press/ Harris-Decima poll reported NDP support to be 17 per cent, and Green at 11 per cent- a collective total of 28 -, more than the Liberal’s 24 per cent, but not quite the Conservative’s 36 per cent.

Now, I understand, polls are often skewed (a margin of error of 2.8 per cent, 19 times out of 20, to be exact). Though, they are good for one thing: trends. With enough polling and surveys, you are bound to at least get at least a rough sense of the way people are thinking in the country. So, if people in Canada continue to think the way that these polls have been indicating for quite some time now, the Liberals will continue to lose support, the NDP will gain what the liberals lose, the Green will increase and the Conservatives will remain relatively stable.

Considering the Green, a leftist party, has a growing support base, I’m sure that they are hopeful of some sort of political and ideological respect at a federal level. I don’t think I even need to mention the name of the party that they will get the least from, or for that matter, the second least.

Here is what I am getting at, and this isn’t meant to be controversial or to rub anybody the wrong way:

Logically, one can assume the Green would be happiest with an NDP opposition, considering their relative position on the political spectrum and this is where the strategic voting comes into play.

retrieved from politicalcompass.org

retrieved from politicalcompass.org. Although I would argue that the Greens ought to be listed a little bit further left, the relative orientation is agreeable.

If you have read this far in this article, then I am sure you are aware of the way in which Canada’s “first past the post” electoral system works. If you aren’t, it’s simple. The party with the most seats is in power. If they score more than half of the seats, they win a majority – a political position with a relatively large amount of power- and if they score less than half of the seats, but still more than the other parties, they win a minority- a political position which requires far more consultation from other parties with federal representation, in particular, the opposition.

So, if the conservatives really are going to win, and you are a leftist voter, why not at least balance the spectrum and vote left, or as left as you can?

With the Liberals losing support and the NDP becoming a serious contender in the race for what looks to be the race to become the official opposition, why not push the NDP closer to power?

This does however, depend on your riding. If you live in a riding that the conservatives have traditionally won, followed by the Liberals, then voting NDP over Green is obviously futile. Your best bet, in this instance, would be to vote Liberal, as a leftist voter.

Provided your riding is always a close race, and you, as an elector, are realistically given the opportunity, why not push NDP toward becoming the official opposition?

It is my assumption, as well, that in a Green-dominant riding, the NDP would be an easy sell.

As it stands in the pre-election polls, if the Green’s support base were to vote NDP, for at least the sake of leftist representation, the NDP would topple the Liberals and become the official opposition party to the Conservatives.

To be clear, I’m not writing this as a personal endorsement for the NDP. Provided the Green had the support base that the NDP has now, the suggestion would be opposite and so on. This is merely meant to off-set arguments against strategic voting and discuss the leftist vote in this election.

Sure, there will always be people who won’t change their vote because they are die-hard and loyal voters, and they shouldn’t change their vote; it’s the beauty of democracy. But for those more interested in balancing the power, rather than party loyalty, voting strategically on October 14 is certainly something to consider.

Put it this way, if we have another Conservative minority and the Liberals are the official opposition, nothing will change. It is the same situation we have now.

If you want change, you have to vote for change.

It is a matter of making the best of the situation at hand. Canada’s archaic electoral system allows for a majority very easily and that certainly isn’t going to change before October 14.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Toronto’s Problematic Gun Amnesty

Toronto Police and Henry’s camera stores have teamed up to promote gun owners to trade in their guns and get a point and shoot digital camera in return. The program is called “Pixels for Pistols.”

What gun owner wouldn’t prefer to take a picture of cans lined along the fence?

The guns for cameras amnesty between Toronto and Henry’s was reported in the Toronto Star last Saturday.

Image found on ubergizmo.com
Image found on ubergizmo.com

The concept is simple; cough up your old shot gun or tamer rifle and get a Nikon Coolpix P60. Give up your handgun or assault rifle and get a Nikon Coolpix S52. Both “prizes” from Henry’s come with a voucher for photography lessons at the store.

Don’t get me wrong; I think that guns ought to be eliminated. There simply is no need for people to be toting lethal weapons, meant for shooting and hurting (or killing) humans and animals, around the city, or for that matter, at all. The approach just isn’t right.

The amnesty raises the obvious question: why cameras? And what would promote a gun owner to want one? Let alone trade their firearm for something that they probably already have; a cheap, point and shoot digital camera.

The amnesty aside, the new team-up between Toronto and Henry’s camera stores is a classic example of private money in a public place; something proven problematic repeatedly.

For example:

- The Liberal Sponsorship Scandal

-Mulroney/ Schreiber

Earlier this year, after numerous gun-related deaths in the city, David Miller, mayor of Toronto, called for a complete ban on gun clubs in the city, which was ultimately turned down.

Miller’s call to close shooting ranges, though not completely fulfilled, has made some sort of positive impact; people are no longer lugging their guns through one of the busiest spots in the city -Union Station- to a little-known gun club hidden upstairs. As a compromise to his proposal, only the gun clubs and shooting ranges on municipal property have been closed, which included the club hidden at Union Station.

Will this cutely-named “Pistols for Pixels” amnesty really eliminate guns and gun-related criminal activity from the city, or is it just a feel-good solution and some free advertising for Henry’s and Nikon?

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized